<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:rssFeedStyles="http://www.wordpress.org/ns/xslt#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mac mini or iPad Pro M4 for Post?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://digitalproduction.com/2025/05/12/mac-mini-or-ipad-pro-m4-for-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://digitalproduction.com/2025/05/12/mac-mini-or-ipad-pro-m4-for-post/</link>
	<description>Magazine for Digital Media Production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Final Cut Pro:Mac mini or iPad M4? - DIGITAL PRODUCTION		</title>
		<link>https://digitalproduction.com/2025/05/12/mac-mini-or-ipad-pro-m4-for-post/#comment-80550</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Final Cut Pro:Mac mini or iPad M4? - DIGITAL PRODUCTION]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 06:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://digitalproduction.com/?p=166890#comment-80550</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] is recommended for serious video production, whereas the iPad suits H.264, H.265 and ProRes users. The first part of our review has shown some disadvantages of the iPad Pro over using the Mac mini Pro for DaVinci Resolve 19, in [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is recommended for serious video production, whereas the iPad suits H.264, H.265 and ProRes users. The first part of our review has shown some disadvantages of the iPad Pro over using the Mac mini Pro for DaVinci Resolve 19, in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
