A proper hardware device by Blackmagic Design (BM for short) and a calibrated screen has been the iron law for any professional user of DaVinci Resolve (DR for short). But for all those working under MacOS, this may have been valid for the longest time. We are looking at recent changes in DR for those without one. Spoiler: calibration still matters!

How to check

To see what’s going on when playing your movie on other devices and players you can compare your own footage, for sure. At least, if you were the colorist, you should know how it should look like. But if you are unsure (and our memory for colors can be tricked easily), there is the classic SMPTE chart in DR, which has the so-called PLUGE pulse (short for picture line-up generation equipment) in the lower right. In the wider black bar there are two narrow zones with a value just above black, the left one being the darker one (check your waveform).

If your blacks are not crushed by a false gamma interpretation, you should be able to see the right bar just faintly inside the black stripe. The middle one may only become visible if the shadows are lifted too much. Of course, it all depends on your screen too. If it’s not capable of showing black or at least near black, the rest of that whole area will not be pitch black, making it harder to judge the subtle differences. Actually, there is a third bar to the left of the two, but that is reaching down into the sub-black area and only visible if you have exported the file with “Retain sub-black and super-white data” activated. Normally it is just cut off.

Calibration options

DisplayCal is plugging into DR and sending its test patches through the grading software over any compatible I/O device to the screen you need to calibrate. The resulting LUT can be copied into DR and used as a monitoring LUT to correct deviations of the connected screen. This approach works absolutely correctly with the right settings in DisplayCal, being able to avoid any interference of the operating system, be it MacOS, Windows or Linux. Final precision is limited only by shortcomings of your monitor, like weak shadow areas, as visible below. BTW, those small spikes and minor shifts in the waveform are caused by compression in our recorder.

In our series of articles for those not able to spend a fortune on high-end solutions, we have shown how to get a proper LUT with the help of free software and second-hand hardware for Apple silicon. But now we have two solutions pretty much on par regarding calibration in the operating system by an ICC profile. So, we wanted to know if one can live without such an I/O device and that perfect calibration over the whole chain. Actually, BM has recently changed how preview windows and full screen display color and contrast. So, ICC profiles may not be insufficient any more for DR on a Mac with a screen adhering to standard!

Direct monitoring

BM has supported the use of Mac display profiles in DR’s viewers under MacOS for quite some time, even in 10-bit. But due to peculiarities carried over from older systems, they needed to use a non-standard version of Rec. 709, called 709-A. That was nothing but a crutch, and it was not only Apple’s fault that contrast and brightness were inconsistent between many players and other devices. If you are seriously bored, you can read this thread, with over 20 pages, the longest one ever in the DR user forum. You can follow some true experts and many wannabes there, discussing a ‘final’ solution. So, what’s our take on it?

The Never Ending Story: Are Apple XDR devices suitable for reference use in colour grading?

The main problem is lack of timely standardization when everything went from tubes to digital cameras and screens. The Rec. 709 standard for HDTV was defined based on analog technology, which behaved differently from modern cameras and screens. The newer addition to that standard is called BT. 1886, but it was only published by the ITU in 2011.

At that time there were already too many digital technologies in use, and most manufacturers didn’t really care much about adherence to a standard coming so late. BT.1886 defines a gamma (a contrast curve) of 2.4, which is fine for viewing TV in a rather dimly lit living room. Adjusting that curve is not really adhering to the standard, but on this model of a TV, for example, a value of +2 will get it to 2.2.

This slightly older Samsung TV, as a typical example, is offering modes like Movie, Natural, Standard, and Dynamic. Nothing says “Rec. 709” or “BT. 1886” right away, but „Natural“ is actually adhering to BT.1886, even fixed to it. „Standard“ is BT. 1886 too by default, but allows you to override that gamma in the expert settings – go figure. “Movie” is also adhering to BT.1886, but with a very warm tint – which again can be overridden, just like gamma. Recent ones have the “Filmmaker” setting, which is supposed not to change anything, and “Dynamic” is for bright rooms. Have fun with all the creative names and options of other manufacturers!

A lighter and less contrasty gamma of 2.2 might be better in a brighter environment. Mobile devices in particular are watched wherever you go. Even if some can reach very high brightness values these days, details in darker areas of the image can get lost if the content was graded as 2.4. Encoding clips for social media instead of movies for cinema buffs may profit from a gamma of 2.2, which is correctly flagged as 1-4-1 by DR. It even adheres to a standard, called BT.470 System M, as shown by MediaInfo (free). But this was a standard for analog television in some parts of the world only, and is now considered historical.

But do TVs and other devices really check such flags, which contain the information about encoding in your digital video files? They should tell the playback device which colour primaries, which colour matrix, and which gamma (called transfer characteristics here) were used. If you check with the info function for a video file on a Mac, the ones for Rec. 709 BT. 1886 are code points 1-1-1 or flags (I’ll use flag from here). They will be listed by cross-platform software such as MediaInfo as Rec. 709 for all three parameters.

In a perfect world, all playback devices and software players should respect such flags and show your video accordingly. Well, at least most of them assume your sources are 1-1-1, but often don’t care if it’s flagged as anything else, like 1-4-1 or 1-2-1. Some even force 1-1-1 on your clips, whatever they are. As we all know, YouTube is recompressing your sources, which is acceptable if the quality is good enough. But what’s absolutely unacceptable: whatever your original flagging was, YouTube will set it to 1-1-1 without even asking you! Just try to send one of your clips to YT and read it back. The free video patcher AMCDX by Alex Mogurenko will help you to correct wrong flags, but you need to remember the original encoding.

What to do?

In consequence, your results, which you encoded as gamma 2.2 for viewing in brighter environments, will actually be displayed darker and loose detail in the shadows. And if you encode from DR as Rec.709 gamma 2.4, which is offered as another option, it may too bright and lack contrast and saturation on players or a browser not respecting the flags. So, always encode as Rec. 709 (Scene) and hope for the best. It should look right on a TV with the correct settings. These can normally be found on most modern TVs or monitors if you dig deep enough into the menus, either as Rec. 709 or BT. 1886. Out of the box, many TVs are set to a very contrasty and saturated look, shouting out “Buy Me!” to the visitors of a mall for electronics.

The very popular VLC player is another example of ignoring flags, while we can recommend mpv player or its descendants for observance of flags. Of course, this says nothing yet about the quality of the screen attached to it. If that one is not calibrated, or at least set correctly in its menus, the image may still be far off. And then, there are all those image ‘enhancements’ imposed by digital TVs for viewing conditions, like bright environments or late hours. Or think of a projector meant to be visible in a not so dimly lit boardroom and optimized for (visual!) clarity of business charts.

Recommendations

Recent MacBooks and iPad Pro models have excellent blacks and offer reference modes for several standards, including HDTV (BT.709-BT. 1886). These are factory-calibrated and deactivate any image adjustments, assuming an environment properly lit for grading. Now, there is some sample variation and according to our own measurements, the nit value for white can be a tad low, like around 90 instead of 100 (some experts even suggest 120). Nevertheless, such screens come pretty close to a properly calibrated screen in the lower price range and offer much better blacks than conventional IPS panels.

If you are working for TV, we would still advise a professional, calibrated monitor via an I/O device. But, at least with the settings explained above, your viewers in DR will not look completely off when a client is looking over your shoulder. For all those working for social media, where your audience will have devices that you can’t control anyway, we suggest sticking to the only widespread norm: Rec. 709 with a gamma of 2.4. If you are concerned about visibility in bright environments, change the lighting in your room and check with an average smartphone, but avoid the setting for gamma 2.2 when rendering.

If you work for clients who want your results for social media, but are picky about how their movies look, you may need to supply them with an iPad Pro for presentations. Set it to a reference mode, block that, and try to explain to them why their average boardroom projector may look different. You may even want to take a photograph of TVs in an electronics market showing the same content next to each other.

Let’s do it on a Mac

So you’ve got a MacBook Pro (MBP for short) with Apple silicon and you’ve got a calibration probe, be it by Datacolor or Calibrite. But working just for the internet, you didn’t invest in an I/O device. We don’t care which generation of that laptop, as long as it has the nice XDR screen and reference modes. But who likes to work with DaVinci Resolve on such a small screen (even the menu bar is too short for all the little extras)? Let’s say you have a larger screen with decent color quality attached when you start grading at your home base. After all, not only Apple says that you should be grading to standards in a controlled environment – something hard to find in a hotel room or on the road. Now calibrate that external screen with your probe, and you’ll be generating just an ICC profile for the Mac in this case. More than one profile can be prepared for the correction of different monitors, which will be managed by the system.

Brightness according to BT. 1886 would be 100 nit, but 120 fits modern screens better. The steps needed for calibration are fully self-explanatory with the Spyder Pro software, and the result on a decent screen is very close to what we see on the MBP when set to reference mode. OK, DisplayCal may be a tad more precise. But it’s more complicated and taking many more measurements, resulting in excessively long lunch breaks.

You need to set the system preferences of DR to use the Mac profiles, as already shown above, and now you have to stick to Rec. 709 (Scene) on the Deliver page to get your output and its flags right. Do not use Rec. 709 Gamma 2.4, even if theoretically it should be the same!

Your timeline can be whatever you prefer: Rec. 709, ACES, or DaVinci Wide Gamut Intermediate (DWG). Of course, with manual settings your first node should get a CST (Color Space Transform) to adapt the incoming camera sources to DWG. Resolve’s automatic setting, called DaVinci YRGB Color Managed (aka RCM) set to SDR would also deliver the flags as 1-1-1, by the way. But you may need to check if the incoming footage’s color and gamma is identified correctly or needs to be set manually. That’s often the case if some difficult source has been transcoded into an intermediate codec, like ProRes, DNxHR, or Cineform.

Conclusion

In the end, you need to understand that rendering into a specific colour space and gamma is actually changing the visual content of your results. 
Tags are just metadata, which should trigger the right interpretation in players. That’s the point where chaos breaks loose, because manufacturers often don’t care for the tags and display your video based on assumptions. The only reliable approach is encoding to Rec. 709 with a gamma of 2.4 and having the tags set to 1-1-1, which is automatically done if you render into Rec.709 (scene).

The post LUTs, Tags, or ICC: Getting Colours Right in Resolve on a Mac first appeared on DIGITAL PRODUCTION and was written by Uli Plank.

Even if you really want to, you have your workflow and rarely have the time to really get to know the new software. In the end, I was tired of getting slowed down by a constantly crashing software and not being able to render without artefacts. I thought the time spent on these issues with Premiere would have been better spent switching, especially since I was already colour grading in Davinci Resolve. To make the transition easier, here are some tips for switching from Premiere Pro to Davinci Resolve so you can get started as quickly and efficiently as possible:

Project Manager: Wait, where did I save my project?

One big difference between Davinci Resolve and Premiere Pro is how projects are managed. For this, the first thing you will see when opening the software is the Project Manager. This is the place to create and manage your projects. I’m honest: when switching, that was something that needed some time to adapt to, but it’s worth it.

While Premiere Pro projects are saved as files where you decide where, Davinci Resolve works with managed Libraries. These are structured containers that serve as a central repository for all project data. Libraries are managed via the Project Manager and can be hosted on your computer, on a networked server or in the Blackmagic Cloud. To switch between the three options, simply click on the one you choose in the top left corner of the Project Manager.

If you tend to make copies of your project on your computer to keep backups, this will change your workflow. But we’ll take a look at that later. For now, it’s important to know that projects saved in your active project library can easily be exported to your hard drive as a .drp file for a manual backup or transfer to another system. To export your project, right-click it and choose export.

Libraries come with some advantages. My favourite one: multiuser collaboration. I can’t describe how useful this is! Editors, colourists, VFX artists and sound engineers – everybody can work with the same project file on different workstations. Even at the same time, in the same timeline. Brilliant and timesaving.

Also speeding me up: powerbins. These are useful when working with media I use in multiple projects. They make media easily accessible across different projects, as long as it is in the same Project Library.  

Pages: Where do I start?

When switching from Premiere Pro, you’ll probably be used to using Dynamic Linking to get your edit into Audition, After Effects and Media Encoder to complete your postproduction process. In Resolve, this is what the Pages are for.

These follow the typical postproduction process from ingest to delivery, which provides a great advantage: you can have your whole postproduction in just one software. No exporting timelines for audio postproduction, visual effects or colour and no translation issues between software. There’s no need to manage multiple project files or export assets to get them from one project into another. Changes made in one page are instantly accessible in others, and you can quickly go back and forth as needed to change things.

I think to start, it’s important to say: Most things can be achieved in the Edit Page. Don’t get scared away by the masses of pages and functions! There are different ways to achieve your goal when editing, and you will get around very well, mostly by starting in Edit Page. Lots of functions from other pages are also available there. If you like, you can even turn off pages you don’t want to use in the preferences. To still give you a bit of orientation, here’s a quick overview of what the different pages are for:

The Media Page is for ingesting and organising. Right next to it we find the Cut page, which is an editing interface designed for speed. In the Edit Page, we have the traditional editing interface, which should be very familiar to you, coming from Premiere Pro. Quite different from After Effects is Fusion, the node-based workspace for compositing and VFX. The Colorpage – quite self-explanatory – is made for colour grading. Fairlight is the page where you can mix and master your audio after editing to then, finally, render your video out in the Deliver Page.

Interface basics: Where to find what you need

It will probably need some time for you to adapt to what’s different. One of the things that took me a while to get used to was the fixed panel places. While we’re used to being able to move everything around freely in Premiere Pro, Davinci Resolve allows only view windows to pop out and be moved freely throughout all pages. But once I adapted, it made total sense where everything is.

In the Edit Page, one big part of the window is the timeline in the lower part of the screen. Above that, we’ve got the source viewer and timeline viewer. Note: When your screen is too small or your screen resolution is too low, you might only see one viewer. Don’t worry, you can easily switch between those pressing Q.

In the Edit Page there are nine panels you can open and close by clicking their buttons located in the upper part of the screen. The ones on the upper left side will then open on the left and vice versa. The Media Pool on the upper left will give you fast access to your footage. It’s the same Media Pool as in the Media Page which we’ll look at later. The Effects panel, the index, and the mixer should be intuitive when switching from Premiere, though the feature I love most in the panels is the Inspector on the upper left side.

It could be compared to the effects controls in Premiere but has basic effects like crop already integrated, as well as more advanced effects like stabilisation, speed change, retime, and scaling.

Even though most panels are fixed, you can give yourself some more space by closing the panels you don’t need. Depending on whether you have opened multiple panels from both sides or not, they can be full-screen height or half-screen height. Accidentally messed up your UI? Don’t worry. You can quickly reset your UI layout in the menu Workspace > Reset UI Layout.

You’ll find dual-screen mode, full-screen Timeline, and, using Resolve Studio, permanent full-screen video out in the same menu.

Live Save and Project Backups

When working in Premiere Pro I often feared software crashes. I tried to save after every single thing I did because autosaving just didn’t cut it. Davinci Resolves Auto Save, which is called Live Save, is on a completely different level. I never fear that something is gone! I’ve got way fewer issues with the software crashing, but if it does, I know that what I did last will be there.

To restore the backups, right-click the project in the Project Manager. This won’t overwrite the current project version you’re working in. If you’re used to copying your Premiere Pro Sequence to revert to an earlier version of your edit, you may like to check out the Timeline backup function. It works just like Project Backups and can be activated and customised in the same spot. To restore a Timeline Backup, right-click on the timeline in either the media panel or Media Page. Just note: Timeline Backups will be stored locally, even when working on Network or Cloud Libraries, so they will only be accessible on the system where they were created.

Media Page: Import and Media Organisation

The one time I’d highly recommend switching pages is when importing media into your project. Even though it is possible to import media on all pages except Deliver, the Media Page offers many options for importing and managing your media.

The Media Page is split into Media Storage and Media Pool. The upper-left is Media Storage, which might be familiar to you if you used the Media Browser in Premiere Pro. It’s effectively a file browser for finding or exploring files on drives mounted on your computer. What I find very useful about this: you can quickly review or check footage in the viewer in the top-right corner of your screen, even without importing. A little extra: hovering over the footage lets you scrub through and preview without loading a clip into the viewer.

The lower part of the screen is your Media Pool – the project-specific repository for all the assets you’re importing or creating in Resolve, like footage, audio files, timelines, etc. On the left side, you’ll find the current projects bin list with the master bin. It’s the top level of your projects’ folder structure where all the other bins containing your project’s footage are listed. The right side shows the inside of the currently opened bin.

To get your footage into Resolve, simply drag and drop it from Media Storage, Finder, or Explorer into the Media Pool. If doing so on the Media Storage Bin list, the folder structure will be translated into the bin structure of your project. When adding to the right side, all the footage will be unpacked into the current bin

But there are other import options that let you stay in Resolve, leading to the same results: when you navigate to your folder in the Media Storage and right-click it, you’ll see the option to import your footage folder and all its subfolders into the current bin. This I find useful when working e.g., with Sony in camera folder structures, where you don’t want all the extra bins. Alternatively, you can choose “add folder and Sub folders into Media Pool (creating bins)” to get your complete folder structure as sub bins in the current bin. This is helpful if you already have your folders sorted out on your hard drive and want to copy the structure into Resolve.

Ways to create and work with proxies

Depending on the footage you’re working on, you might want to render some proxies. This is one particularly strong thing in Resolve and speeds me up quite a bit. You’ve got two options: if you’ve already set up your project and imported your footage, it’s super easy to create proxies by right-clicking on some highlighted footage and choosing proxie media > generate proxy media from the project settings.

In this case, it will automatically create proxies for the highlighted clips and save them in the location that is set in the project settings > master setting when scrolling down to working folders.

The Quality of the proxies can be defined in the same menu at optimised media and render cash. The proxy resolution is defined in relation to the original resolution. Possibilities are, for example: original, half of the original, a quarter of the original, etc. By default, it’s set to “choose automatically”, which will generate at the current set timeline resolution. When working with proxies, you can switch fast between disabling All proxies, preferring proxies and preferring camera originals, in the Timeline viewer.

You can also see whether proxies are attached by the white (for high-resolution) or purple (for proxies) icon on your clip, which will be visible in the thumbnail of your clip in the media pool.

If you really want to speed up your preparation process in advance, you should look into the Blackmagic Proxy Generator, an external tool which will automatically be installed with Davinci Resolve. It gives you the opportunity to render proxies in advance, without even having to get your project set up before. The proxies will then automatically be attached when importing the footage into a project.

This process will ensure you can go straight into editing when setting up your project. The strongest part of this tool is the watch folder function, which continues to scan your chosen folders for additional footage even after generating proxies. Very useful when you keep adding footage to folders you’re already working with.

Organising footage with scene metadata and smart bins

After you’ve added everything to your bins, it’s time to organise your footage. With Premiere Pro, I used to either restructure footage directly in bins, which made everything messy quite quickly, or sort my footage into sequences. In Resolve, I recommend using the scene metadata and smart bins. I know that Premiere Pro also lets you create smart bins using metadata, but it wasn’t intuitive enough for me to use back then. Resolve on the other side makes it super easy:

On the Media Page, click one clip or highlight multiple, then navigate to the top-right to close the audio panel. This will give your open Metadata panel more space. Choose “shot and scene” from the three-dotted menu. There, you’ve got lots of options to set metadata. One thing I like to use in this context is Clip colour, since it gives me an easy way to differentiate between different footage, for example, interviews with different people. Other than that, you can set metadata and let Davinci Resolve create smart bins based on it. For a start, I’d recommend you use Keywords. To do so, enter a Keyword you want to sort your footage by into the Keyword cell.

Then navigate to the bottom-left of your screen to find the Smart Bin List. By default, there should be a bin for Keywords. Davinci Resolve automatically generates one smart bin for every keyword you set before. By clicking on ‘Keywords’, a menu with all the smart bins will open.

Personally, I love this feature because it lets me keep my original folder structure while allowing me to sort my footage more intuitively. It also allows me to have the same clip in different bins, e.g., for location and person, which speeds up my process. With all this said, you should have everything you need to make your first steps in the software. Next up: how to get your Project Settings and Timeline right to start your first edit in Davini Resolve.

The post Getting your bearings: Switching from Premiere Pro to DaVinci Resolve first appeared on DIGITAL PRODUCTION and was written by Jana Johnston.

Time in Pixels has introduced Live Pack, a premium add-on for Nobe OmniScope Pro that extends the software beyond the grading suite and onto the set. The new package is aimed at DITs, live production teams, and multi-camera environments where signal analysis must happen quickly, preferably without ritual sacrifice to the cable gods.

A scope that wants to leave the desk

Live Pack adds seven features to Nobe OmniScope Pro: SDI output via supported Blackmagic DeckLink and UltraStudio hardware, direct Pomfort Livegrade integration, multi-input monitoring with composite grid layouts, file recording, interval-based snapshots, focus peaking, and loudness metering for EBU R128 and ATSC A/85. The add-on is a one-time purchase rather than a subscription, which remains refreshingly free of rental fever. An existing Nobe OmniScope Pro licence is required.

The useful bit: less hardware nonsense

The most interesting addition for on-set colour work is the Pomfort connection. Live Pack integrates directly with Pomfort Livegrade and uses software-based GPU signal sharing instead of SDI loopbacks or extra routing hardware. This should be near zero latency and a feature that requires Pomfort Livegrade 7.1 or later and is available in the 1.11.x beta line. In less ceremonial language, that means fewer cables, fewer boxes, and fewer opportunities for a tiny connector to ruin everybody’s mood before lunch.

More inputs, less squinting

The multi-input side also makes sense in context. DP’s January 2024 look at OmniScope already highlighted the Input Strip as one of the software’s most useful additions for handling multiple signals.

Live Pack extends that idea with support for multiple inputs and composite views in layouts such as 1×2, 2×2, 2×3 and 2×4. That gives users a built-in multi-viewer for camera matching, confidence monitoring and side-by-side signal comparison without having to spread the job across three screens and a prayer.

Recording, snapshots and the quiet luxury of evidence

Live feeds can be recorded directly to disk, and the snapshot system can capture stills at fixed intervals down to milliseconds. Those snapshots can then be reused as live input sources for side-by-side comparisons.

This is exactly the sort of feature that looks modest in a bullet list and then becomes extremely persuasive the moment somebody insists that Camera B definitely looked different twenty minutes ago. Now there is evidence, which is terribly inconvenient for mythology.

Focus and loudness join the party

Live Pack also adds focus peaking and loudness tools, which makes the package more relevant beyond pure colour work. There are two peaking modes, Enhanced Edges and Normal, plus adjustable thresholds and peaking colour. The loudness meter supports both EBU R128 and ATSC A/85, which gives the software more value in broadcast and event workflows where technical monitoring and compliance need to coexist without becoming a relay race between applications.

For those who do not know the tool

Nobe OmniScope has been one of the more respected software scope solutions in this part of the industry for years. In DP’s January and February 2025 coverage of CineMon, OmniScope was (and is) still the leading option on macOS and Windows in this category, even as newer competitors started poking at the edges of the market. That matters because Live Pack is not trying to inflate a lightweight utility into something grand. It is extending a tool that already had a reputation for serious signal work and unusually deep control.

That pattern also shows up in Time in Pixels’ recent releases. In February 2026, DP covered Nobe LutBake and noted the same general design logic: practical, clear, and built for people who would rather work than admire a fashionable interface. Live Pack fits neatly into that line. It does not try to turn OmniScope into an everything machine. It takes the parts that matter on set and in live environments and makes them faster, tighter and more immediately useful. Which, in production, is usually more valuable than a hundred visionary claims and a launch trailer full of glowing particles.

View this post on Instagram

Pricing

Pricing is currently a launch offer of 99 US dollars or 85 euros for a 2-seat licence, with a regular price of 149 dollars, available until 24 March 2026. Nope, still no subscription, no recurring fees, just a simpüle license. Do you remember the golden times, when that was the standard?

Why this matters for DP readers

The practical takeaway is straightforward. If you already use OmniScope in post, Live Pack makes the jump to on-set and live monitoring much more credible: specific, practical and allergic to fluff. Some tools announce a revolution. Others quietly remove three recurring annoyances from your day. The second category tends to age better.

Nobe OmniScope – so far!

// Live Pack Documentation

https://docs.timeinpixels.com/nobe-omniscope/live-pack-add-on

The post Nobe OmniScope gets Live Pack for on-set and live monitoring first appeared on DIGITAL PRODUCTION and was written by Bela Beier.

LOOKSfilm brought Overmind Studios in as the sole VFX vendor for all six episodes of A World Divided, a historical drama following six real figures from World War II through the 1960s. The series blended archival material with recreated drama and moved across locations from New Mexico and China to Russia, Israel and French Algeria.

Shot in Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and Poland, the project demanded constant geographic reshaping and period-authentic cleanup to sell multiple continents and decades, all while working to rolling episodic deadlines.

Tobias Kummer was VFX lead on A World Divided at Overmind Studios. He supervised on set on key shoot days, built the project pipeline and delivered the work alongside André Gerhardt as a two-person VFX team. (Site | IMDB | Linkedin | Xing)

DP: How did you come onto A World Divided, and what was the overall scope?

Tobias Kummer: LOOKSfilm brought us in as the sole VFX vendor for all six episodes. We’ve worked with them before, so there was already trust there. The series was a historical drama following six real figures from World War II through the 1960s. It wove archival material together with recreated drama and jumped across locations from New Mexico and China to Russia, Israel and French Algeria.

André Gerhardt and I handled the VFX work as a two-person team, with me also covering on-set supervision on key days. Across the season, we delivered around 125 shots in total.

DP: What were the main categories of VFX work across the season?

Tobias Kummer: Most of the work fell into a handful of categories. The biggest chunk was geographic transformations and set extension work. The show was shot in Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and Poland, but it needed to represent locations across multiple continents, so we were constantly reshaping the world. We made the Pustynia Błędowska desert in Poland read as New Mexico in some scenes and as Israel in others. We replaced window views with believable locations and extended sets to fit both the period and the geography.

Period cleanup was the other constant. Removing anachronisms took up a steady portion of the workload, such as power lines, phone masts, wind turbines, modern signage, contemporary vehicles, basically anything that didn’t exist between the 1940s and 1960s. Some removals were straightforward paint-outs, while others required proper tracking and reconstruction for moving shots, especially given the anamorphic lens characteristics to account for.

Beyond that, there was a lot of environmental and atmospheric work. We added snow to summer shoots where winter was required, enhanced practical smoke and explosions with additional elements, and built the nuclear explosion sequence. There were also the smaller, problem-solving shots that always appeared on a show like this, including window inserts, moon replacements, damage work, retouching visible wig seams and removing on-set facilities from reflections. Many shots weren’t just one technique. A single exterior might have needed cleanup, set extension and atmos all layered in one comp.

DP: What constraints shaped the work most?

Tobias Kummer: What shaped the work was the schedule and the fact that we were a two-person team delivering an episodic shot count with rolling deadlines. Episodes moved into colour on a rolling basis, which meant we had to work sequentially and finish each episode properly before moving on to the next. We couldn’t cherry-pick shots across the whole season when we needed breathing room. There was a clear rhythm to the work. However, we had to maintain strict discipline.

“What shaped the work was the schedule, and the reality of being a two-person team delivering an episodic shot count with rolling deadlines.”

DP: How did the anamorphic photography affect VFX, especially cleanup?

Tobias Kummer: The anamorphic photography added complexity in places you might not expect. Distortion and breathing made tracking more challenging than it would have been with spherical lenses, particularly on handheld or more dynamic shots. We had everything from locked-off tripod plates to dolly moves, cranes, and handheld coverage, so even simple cleanup could have become complicated if you wanted it to sit cleanly while preserving the anamorphic feel.

DP: What did on-set supervision change for you in practical terms?

Tobias Kummer: On-set supervision helped in practical ways. Sometimes it was about making sure we had clean plates and tracking markers. At other times, it was flagging modern details before they became post problems. Or it was a small camera placement decision that saved hours of rotoscoping later. We had an initial planning phase with the DOP and directors in May 2023, and on-set supervision ran through the shoot from May to July.

Then there was a long gap. We didn’t receive VFX plates until May 2024, nearly a year after wrapping, because production was working through the edit in the meantime. That delay reinforced something I always try to stress. Write everything down during on-set supervision. No matter how certain you are that you’ll remember something, you won’t a year later. Good notes made it possible to pick the work up again without having to guess.

DP: How did the schedule work once plates started arriving?

Tobias Kummer: Once plates started arriving, we had roughly two weeks per episode, regardless of complexity. VFX production ran for over 12 weeks across the six episodes. Shot complexity varied widely. Some cleanups were quick, while sequences with multiple iterations took longer, but the template system helped. The first shot of a new type might have taken time to establish the approach, but similar shots afterwards moved much faster.

Approvals were efficient. Most shots were approved in versions 1 or 2, and only a handful needed additional revisions. When revisions did happen, they were usually about creative direction rather than technical fixes, which came back to communication and understanding intent early.

DP: How did you split responsibilities as a two-person team?

Tobias Kummer: André and I divided the work in a clear way, but we kept shot ownership flexible. I handled on-set supervision, project planning, client communication and pipeline setup, and I also did shot work as well. André focused on shot execution and handled the motion graphics. We didn’t rigidly assign shot types. It was more fluid. Whoever was free took the next thing that needed doing. Because we were working remotely, communication was essential. We stayed connected throughout the day, and if one of us got stuck, a quick call and a screen share often solved what might have taken hours otherwise in minutes.

DP: What did you use for project management?

Tobias Kummer: For project management, we used Ramses by RxLaboratory. That was our central truth for what was in progress, what was out for review, and what was approved.

I wanted to avoid the usual folder wrangling that came with episodic work, so I built a small Fusion plugin that connected directly to the Ramses API. In practice, it meant that when you opened a shot, the setup was already done. Correct plates, correct naming, correct version number, correct saver paths, and comp settings that matched the show spec. It wasn’t glamorous work, but it prevented mistakes and kept us moving. Templates were the other foundation. I kept them rigid where mistakes were expensive and flexible where a shot needed freedom.

DP: Can you break down the plate specs and colour pipeline?

Tobias Kummer: Plates came from Avid as 4K MXF containers in DNxHR HQX 12-bit with a 1.8 anamorphic squeeze, in ARRI Wide Gamut 4 and LogC4.
We composited in scene-referred linear, so the input linearisation was standardised. Output was standardised too. For review, we rendered previews in Rec.709 using the client reference LUT, so the work looked close to the intended look. Finals went out in ARRI Wide Gamut 4 and LogC4 so the grade could treat VFX shots like any other plate. The LUTs were helpful for context, but we couldn’t bake them into the finals without limiting the colourist’s downstream options.

DP: Why Fusion Studio, and what tools mattered most?

Tobias Kummer: All compositing happened in Fusion Studio, because it was what we knew and because the node-based approach was genuinely flexible under episodic revision pressure. When notes came back, you could restructure a comp non-destructively. Insert processing, reroute parts of the tree, try alternatives, without rebuilding from scratch.

Fusion’s tracker and planar tracker held up well on the anamorphic plates, which mattered for both cleanup and set extension work on moving shots. Magic Mask helped as well. It wasn’t perfect in every case, but it saved us more than once from manual roto. We supplemented with a handful of Reactor tools and some custom tools we’d built, but the aim was to rely on Fusion’s core toolset and maintain a consistent pipeline for broadcast delivery.

We also used Blender for 3D elements and set extension geometry, EmberGen for pyro and atmospheric simulations, SynthEyes for more complex camera solves and Affinity Photo for detailed paint work. All rendering was done locally rather than on a farm, which gave us more control and faster iteration.

DP: Pick one shot that best represented the season. What was it, and how did you approach it?

Tobias Kummer: If I had to pick one shot that summed up the work, it was a vast desert establishing shot where we turned the Polish Pustynia Błędowska into an Israeli desert landscape. The plate was shot on a crane mount, so there was a slight shake, and the camera racked focus between foreground and background. In the original plate, you could see the forest at the edges of the location, which didn’t sell the intended geography at all.

This was a case where on-set supervision paid off. Had we gone with the initial framing, we would have had the actors’ heads and the car crossing the horizon line, which would have meant rotoscoping them out to replace the background. I asked for a slight adjustment to the camera placement so everything stayed below the horizon. That saved hours of roto later and made the background replacement much cleaner.

In Fusion Studio, we used a few point tracks to stabilise and reapply the move, and we paid close attention to the rack focus because anamorphic lenses can shift and breathe, causing the background to drift if you ignore it. We built a matte painting from Israeli desert reference photos for the mountainous backdrop. We added blowing sand using an EmberGen simulation we had created and reused across multiple desert shots, and we added heat haze with a simple Fast Noise feeding a Displace node. The focus rack was matched by hand with keyframes. The shot was approved in version two.

DP: What were the key lessons you took from delivering this as a small team?

Tobias Kummer: If I had to distil it down to what kept us on time while maintaining quality, it came down to a few habits. First, learn some scripting, Python or whatever your tools support, and automate the repetitive, error-prone parts of the job. The time savings compounded quickly, especially for a small team, and you don’t need to build for massive scale to benefit.

Second, organise everything and document it. When you’re juggling episodes, you can’t waste time on version mix-ups or folder hunting, and the year gap between shoot and plate delivery made that even more important. Lastly, don’t waste time being stuck. Fresh eyes solved problems faster and a quick screen share could save hours. And honestly, sometimes the best decision was to stop and sleep. If you weren’t making progress, you’d often solve it faster in the morning.

The post A World Divided: Shaping a Global WWII Epic at Overmind Studios first appeared on DIGITAL PRODUCTION and was written by Bela Beier.

For those who don’t know the developer: Time in Pixels develops colour workflow utilities such as Nobe OmniScope for professional grading. Nobe LutBake works with DaVinci Resolve Studio and is designed for colourists who need to generate LUTs quickly for set, monitoring, or downstream tools.

A small tool with sharp elbows

Time in Pixels has introduced Nobe LutBake, a macOS utility that captures grades from DaVinci Resolve Studio and exports them as 3D LUT files using a global hotkey. The concept is simple and, for working colourists, appealing. Instead of stepping through Resolve’s built-in export dialogue, LutBake allows users to define the part of the node tree to be baked and trigger LUT creation instantly. One key press. One .cube file on disk.

Two nodes and done

LutBake consists of an OFX plugin and a companion macOS menu bar application. The OFX plugin is inserted into the Resolve node graph. Two LutBake nodes are required. One is placed before the grade to be captured, and one after. The user performs grading as usual, including wheels, curves, qualifiers, and other LUTs. When the global shortcut is pressed, LutBake captures the RGB transform between the two nodes and writes it to disk as a standard .cube 3D LUT.

No timeline render is required. No still export. No navigating menus. The system level hotkey means the user remains in the grading interface. This is not a reinvention of LUT theory. It is an attempt to remove repetitive steps from daily prodcution.

Resolution matters

Time in Pixels states that LutBake can generate LUTs up to 100 by 100 by 100 in resolution. In practical terms, a 3D LUT samples the RGB colour cube at discrete intervals. Higher resoultion means denser sampling and potentially smoother transforms, particularly in wide gamut or high dynamic range workflows.

Tom also claims zero interpolation error when matching HALD sizes. A HALD image is a flattened representation of a 3D LUT used for exchange and validation. A free demo version is available with limited LUT resolution (17x17x17 LUT). The full version is offered as a one-time licence for 55€, with launch pricing detailed on the product page.

RGB in, RGB out

Time in Pixels is explicit about the limits. LutBake captures RGB-based colour transforms only. Spatial effects, such as blur or grain, are not preserved in the exported LUT. Temporal processing is also excluded. This is not a software limitation but a format one. A 3D LUT maps input RGB triplets to output RGB triplets. It does not encode spatial context, motion, or texture-dependent operations. For colourists building looks that include noise reduction, halation, or grain layers, this is a necessary reminder. Those elements will not survive the bake.

On set and hardware workflows

LutBake is useful for on-set and monitoring scenarios. It references exporting custom looks from Resolve for use in LiveGrade, Assimilate Scratch and hardware LUT devices such as Flanders BoxIO and TVLogic IS Mini. These devices typically ingest .cube LUTs for display calibration or on-set look management. In such environments, speed matters. A colourist may adjust a look in Resolve and need a matching LUT on a monitor within minutes.

Also: baking complex grading chains into a single LUT to optimise playback performance in other systems. Collapsing a heavy node graph into a single transform can simplify downstream workflows, provided the transform is fully representable in RGB space. Look-sharing between grading systems, NLEs, and compositing applications is another use case.

macOS and Studio only

LutBake runs on macOS 13 or later and requires Resolve Studio with external scripting enabled. The reliance on Studio indicates use of Resolve’s scripting API for communication between the OFX plugin and the external macOS application.

There is no mention of Windows or Linux support yet. There is also no statement about compatibility with the free version of Resolve. The Studio requirement is clear. Studios standardised on macOS grading suites will find this straightforward. Facilities with mixed operating systems will need to review compatibility before deployment.

Naming discipline

The product supports configurable filename templates. This allows users to define how exported LUT files are named. In structured pipelines with strict naming conventions, automated naming reduces manual intervention and the risk of inconsistent file names. This is part of a broader goal of reducing repetitive steps.

A familiar philosophy

Readers of Digital Production will know that we regard Nobe OmniScope as one of the more thoughtfully designed applications in recent years. It focuses on clarity, precision, and usability rather than decorative UI noise. LutBake follows the same philosophy.

What is not specified

The announcement does not detail how LutBake handles complex colour management scenarios, such as ACES pipelines or mixed colour spaces within a project. It does not specify how colour space metadata is treated in the exported LUT. Professionals working in scene referred or HDR workflows will need to validate the output carefully. As with any LUT generation tool, testing in context is essential before deployment in live or client-facing environments.

A pragmatic addition

At its core, Nobe LutBake reduces the number of clicks between a finished grade and a distributable LUT. For colourists who iterate frequently on looks for on set monitoring or cross application exchange, that is not trivial.
It will not replace disciplined colour management.
It will not capture spatial or temporal effects.
It will not make a poor grade better.

It removes friction from a well-understood task. For professionals who export LUTs daily, that may be enough.

Nobe LutBake product page
https://timeinpixels.com/nobe-lutbake/

The post Lutbake adds one-key LUT export to Resolve first appeared on DIGITAL PRODUCTION and was written by Bela Beier.